7 research outputs found

    Comparing Sensory Accessibility Needs in Deaf and Low Vision Populations: an Explorative Study

    Get PDF
    Objective. The objective of the study is to compare hypothesized similar sensory accessibility needs of Lighting, Acoustics, Openness, Color/Contrast, and Services/communication for the hard of hearing and low vision population. Background. The Americans with Disability Act – Architectural Barriers Act Design Guidelines (ADA-ABA, 2004, 2015) provides guidelines to increase accessibility of public buildings for individuals covered by the ADA (1990). However, these guidelines often fall short of providing functional and practical guidelines to be accessible for all. Extant building rating tools fail to attend to the overlap of functional needs for the hard of hearing and/or low vision populations. Thus, there is a need to explore the similarities as they relate to not only accessing the environment but also staying in and engaging with the environment. We hypothesize Lighting, Openness, and Color/Contrast will be important building features to help facilitate engagement in the environment. 2) We hypothesize Acoustics and Services/Communication will have different levels of perceived importance in the facilitation of participation in the environment for hard of hearing and low vision populations. Methods. An exploratory between-group study was conducted through a survey developed specifically for this research study to compare similar sensory accessibility needs for 35 individuals who self-identify as low vision or hard of hearing. A Mann-Whitney U-test analysis (p = 0.01, 95% CI) was run on all the survey questions to analyze the statistical differences of the distributions. Results. The importance of Lighting (U = 82.0, p = .074), Acoustics (U = 192.5, p\u3c0.001), Openness (U = 80.0, p = .064), and Services/communication (U = 86.0, p = .102) showed there was not a statistically significant difference between individuals who are hard of hearing and individuals with low vision. The importance of Color/Contrast (U = 18.5, p\u3c.001) showed a statistically significant difference between individuals who are hard of hearing and individuals with low vision. Discussion. Implications for future research, and limitations are discussed

    Local delivery of molecules from a nanopipette for quantitative receptor mapping on live cells

    No full text
    Using nanopipettes to locally deliver molecules to the surface of living cells could potentially open up studies of biological processes down to the level of single molecules. However, in order to achieve precise and quantitative local delivery it is essential to be able to determine the amount and distribution of the molecules being delivered. In this work, we investigate how the size of the nanopipette, the magnitude of the applied pressure or voltage, which drives the delivery, and the distance to the underlying surface influences the number and spatial distribution of the delivered molecules. Analytical expressions describing the delivery are derived and compared with the results from finite element simulations and experiments on delivery from a 100 nm nanopipette in bulk solution and to the surface of sensory neurons. We then developed a setup for rapid and quantitative delivery to multiple subcellular areas, delivering the molecule capsaicin to stimulate opening of Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid subfamily member 1 (TRPV1) channels, membrane receptors involved in pain sensation. Overall, precise and quantitative delivery of molecules from nanopipettes has been demonstrated, opening up many applications in biology such as locally stimulating and mapping receptors on the surface of live cells
    corecore